Discussion:
Blou Rokkies
(too old to reply)
Bob Dubery
2006-08-21 03:40:05 UTC
Permalink
It occured to me yesterday that I haven't seen a blou rokkie for ....
well I don't know how many years, but 10 at least.

Whatever happened to them? What is the proper name of the church
denomination? And are they still around?
Moira de Swardt
2006-08-21 03:57:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Dubery
It occured to me yesterday that I haven't seen a blou rokkie for ....
well I don't know how many years, but 10 at least.
Some of them are still alive. I knew one slightly and haven't heard
that she has died.
Post by Bob Dubery
Whatever happened to them? What is the proper name of the church
denomination? And are they still around?
No clue. The women also were not allowed to cut their hair, amongst
other things. The woman I knew really just stayed home for most of
the time and looked after her family. She cooked and baked
beautifully, and some days there was a knock on my door and there
someone would be with a gift of fudge, gingerbread or a plate of
food. She never accepted my invitations to dinner, coffee and told
me once that she didn't sit around "chatting" because the devil made
work for idle hands. I got the impression she didn't approve of me,
but was determined to love me anyway. That was during my
conservative time as a Christian. What she'd make of me now ...!
:-)

--
Moira de Swardt posting from Johannesburg, South Africa
Remove the dot in my address to find me at home.
Norman
2006-08-21 05:12:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Moira de Swardt
Post by Bob Dubery
It occured to me yesterday that I haven't seen a blou rokkie for
....
Post by Bob Dubery
well I don't know how many years, but 10 at least.
Some of them are still alive. I knew one slightly and haven't heard
that she has died.
Post by Bob Dubery
Whatever happened to them? What is the proper name of the church
denomination? And are they still around?
No clue. The women also were not allowed to cut their hair, amongst
other things. The woman I knew really just stayed home for most of
the time and looked after her family. She cooked and baked
beautifully, and some days there was a knock on my door and there
someone would be with a gift of fudge, gingerbread or a plate of
food. She never accepted my invitations to dinner, coffee and told
me once that she didn't sit around "chatting" because the devil made
work for idle hands. I got the impression she didn't approve of me,
but was determined to love me anyway. That was during my
conservative time as a Christian. What she'd make of me now ...!
:-)
I'm not sure but I think they were of the same kind of sect as the
Mennonites & Hutterites. It would be a pity to think that as a
religious group they were now extinct.
Bob Dubery
2006-08-21 10:02:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Norman
I'm not sure but I think they were of the same kind of sect as the
Mennonites & Hutterites. It would be a pity to think that as a
religious group they were now extinct.
Well a bit of assiduous googling revealed that the correct name of the
organisation is "The Latter Rain Mission".

See
www.gksa.org.za/kies/Newsletters/Sentinel/Sent1101%20(2003%20Blou%20Rokke).pdf

The LRM in SA was founded by a woman, Maria Martha Fraser.
Norman
2006-08-21 16:01:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Dubery
Post by Norman
I'm not sure but I think they were of the same kind of sect as the
Mennonites & Hutterites. It would be a pity to think that as a
religious group they were now extinct.
Well a bit of assiduous googling revealed that the correct name of the
organisation is "The Latter Rain Mission".
Thanks Bob. Always nice to have a misconception cleared up. I've always
admired those who can express their faith in a public but PEACEFUL
manner as per the mennonites with their horse & buggies, the blou
rokkies & of course the Sally Ann with their brass bands.
Beats the shit out of burning people at the stake or suicide bombings.
Moira de Swardt
2006-08-21 17:14:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Norman
I'm not sure but I think they were of the same kind of sect as the
Mennonites & Hutterites. It would be a pity to think that as a
religious group they were now extinct.
There is a place in life for a group, any sort of group, dying. It
means that it has either served its purpose, or it is failing to
serve its purpose. I cannot see any purpose in a group of people
who withdraw from the world in which they live unless it is to
fulfil a function which can only be done in seclusion.


--
Moira de Swardt posting from Johannesburg, South Africa
Remove the dot in my address to find me at home.
Norman
2006-08-21 23:18:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Moira de Swardt
Post by Norman
I'm not sure but I think they were of the same kind of sect as the
Mennonites & Hutterites. It would be a pity to think that as a
religious group they were now extinct.
There is a place in life for a group, any sort of group, dying. It
means that it has either served its purpose, or it is failing to
serve its purpose. I cannot see any purpose in a group of people
who withdraw from the world in which they live unless it is to
fulfil a function which can only be done in seclusion.
You have me at a loss Moira, the Mennonites, Hutterites & die Blou
Rokkies have never withdraw from the world in which they live.
Cloistered nuns & monks may have been secluded but the three sects
under discussion are very much part of the world.
Moira de Swardt
2006-08-22 04:06:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Norman
Post by Moira de Swardt
Post by Norman
I'm not sure but I think they were of the same kind of sect as the
Mennonites & Hutterites. It would be a pity to think that as a
religious group they were now extinct.
There is a place in life for a group, any sort of group, dying.
It
Post by Norman
Post by Moira de Swardt
means that it has either served its purpose, or it is failing to
serve its purpose. I cannot see any purpose in a group of
people
Post by Norman
Post by Moira de Swardt
who withdraw from the world in which they live unless it is to
fulfil a function which can only be done in seclusion.
You have me at a loss Moira, the Mennonites, Hutterites & die Blou
Rokkies have never withdraw from the world in which they live.
Cloistered nuns & monks may have been secluded but the three sects
under discussion are very much part of the world.
I understood your comment about the link to mean that all three
groups are Anabaptists, but obviously not the same sect within the
Anabaptist movement.

The "Shakers" were Anabaptists, but they did not allow (or at least
discouraged) sex, even within marriage. They died out. Sex is a
natural part of life and groups which discourage or forbid it to the
general public are not likely to survive for long.

My understanding is that the "Blou Rokkies" do not participate in
the affairs of the world, they choose not to vote, not to own
television sets, not to read the news, not to attend movies or the
theatre, not to become involved in the governing bodies of their
schools, not to serve on rate payers associations. By and large the
refusal of people to serve their communities, and participate in
communal life is viewed as anti-social. This is a withdrawal from
the world which is different from that of the cloister in which the
seclusion is specifically to serve the world in a sphere (prayer)
which makes them more useful to the world by their very seclusion.


--
Moira de Swardt posting from Johannesburg, South Africa
Remove the dot in my address to find me at home.
Norman
2006-08-22 05:56:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Norman
Post by Norman
Post by Moira de Swardt
Post by Norman
I'm not sure but I think they were of the same kind of sect as
the
Post by Norman
Post by Moira de Swardt
Post by Norman
Mennonites & Hutterites. It would be a pity to think that as a
religious group they were now extinct.
There is a place in life for a group, any sort of group, dying.
It
Post by Norman
Post by Moira de Swardt
means that it has either served its purpose, or it is failing to
serve its purpose. I cannot see any purpose in a group of
people
Post by Norman
Post by Moira de Swardt
who withdraw from the world in which they live unless it is to
fulfil a function which can only be done in seclusion.
You have me at a loss Moira, the Mennonites, Hutterites & die Blou
Rokkies have never withdraw from the world in which they live.
Cloistered nuns & monks may have been secluded but the three sects
under discussion are very much part of the world.
I understood your comment about the link to mean that all three
groups are Anabaptists, but obviously not the same sect within the
Anabaptist movement.
Anabaptists?????????????????? I never mentioned Anabaptists
Post by Norman
The "Shakers" were Anabaptists, but they did not allow (or at least
discouraged) sex, even within marriage. They died out. Sex is a
natural part of life and groups which discourage or forbid it to the
general public are not likely to survive for long.
I never mentioned the shakers either.
Post by Norman
My understanding is that the "Blou Rokkies" do not participate in
the affairs of the world, they choose not to vote, not to own
television sets, not to read the news, not to attend movies or the
theatre, not to become involved in the governing bodies of their
schools, not to serve on rate payers associations.
There is a world of difference between not participating in some of the
things that make up the norm but that is not the same as withdrawing
from the world. You don't own a DVD but that doesn't mean you are not
participating in life. I met Blou Rokkies on a regular basis in the
Hypermarket at Boksburg & they shopped like anyone else in the world. I
have never served on the governing bodies of any of my kids schools nor
have I belonged to a rate payers association or a political party & the
don't come more wordly than me.
Post by Norman
By and large the
refusal of people to serve their communities, and participate in
communal life is viewed as anti-social.
Sorry Moira that's rubbish. The norm is not to serve or participate, in
fact those that do are generally viewed as "do-gooders".
Moira de Swardt
2006-08-22 17:33:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Norman
Post by Moira de Swardt
Post by Norman
Post by Norman
I'm not sure but I think they were of the same kind of
sect as
Post by Norman
Post by Moira de Swardt
the
Post by Norman
Post by Norman
Mennonites & Hutterites. It would be a pity to think that as a
religious group they were now extinct.
You have me at a loss Moira, the Mennonites, Hutterites & die Blou
Rokkies have never withdraw from the world in which they live.
Cloistered nuns & monks may have been secluded but the three sects
under discussion are very much part of the world.
I understood your comment about the link to mean that all three
groups are Anabaptists, but obviously not the same sect within the
Anabaptist movement.
Anabaptists?????????????????? I never mentioned Anabaptists
You mentioned "the same kind of sect as ...". The two you mentioned
are of the Anabaptist persuasion, so I assumed you meant that the
Blou Rokkies were also Anabaptist.
Post by Norman
Post by Moira de Swardt
The "Shakers" were Anabaptists, but they did not allow (or at least
discouraged) sex, even within marriage. They died out. Sex is a
natural part of life and groups which discourage or forbid it to the
general public are not likely to survive for long.
I never mentioned the shakers either.
I was following the train of thought.
Post by Norman
Post by Moira de Swardt
My understanding is that the "Blou Rokkies" do not participate in
the affairs of the world, they choose not to vote, not to own
television sets, not to read the news, not to attend movies or the
theatre, not to become involved in the governing bodies of their
schools, not to serve on rate payers associations.
There is a world of difference between not participating in some of the
things that make up the norm but that is not the same as
withdrawing
Post by Norman
from the world. You don't own a DVD but that doesn't mean you are not
participating in life.
When one refuses to take part in any form of communal life outside
one's own particular group, even refusing to allow opportunities to
be informed about daily events, then one must assume one has
withdrawn from society and retreated into an artificial world of
one's own creation. It has a broader base than simply owning any
particular set of items.
Post by Norman
I met Blou Rokkies on a regular basis in the
Hypermarket at Boksburg & they shopped like anyone else in the
world. I
Post by Norman
have never served on the governing bodies of any of my kids
schools nor
Post by Norman
have I belonged to a rate payers association or a political party & the
don't come more wordly than me.
You've never served as a community volunteer, say in your wife's
Girl Guide troop? You've never got involved with helping a charity
project which your children have been involved in or benefitted
from? You've never allowed your children to participate in
extra-mural activities which weren't compulsory? You've never
voted? You've never watched the news on television? You've never
read a newspaper? You've never watched a movie? Never given blood?
You've never nipped down to the local for a drink with friends?
You've never belonged to a club, say a shooting club or a gym?
You've never played a team or competitive sport? You wouldn't
currently do any of these things for religious reasons?
Post by Norman
Post by Moira de Swardt
By and large the
refusal of people to serve their communities, and participate in
communal life is viewed as anti-social.
Sorry Moira that's rubbish. The norm is not to serve or
participate, in
Post by Norman
fact those that do are generally viewed as "do-gooders".
Depends at what level one looks at service. The norm is certainly
to participate in community life. Voter turnout is usually greater
than 50% for starters. That makes voting the norm. Most people
have some kind of community life outside the purely religious, a
dance class (dancing is the most widely practiced 'sport' - as
opposed to watched -or social activity in urban black communities) ,
a sports activity, bridge group, singing in a choir etc. Most
parents do at least attend their children's PTA meetings even if
they don't want to serve on the board. They also tend to get
involved in some of the extra mural activities some of the time
(yes, we all know there are parents who are too lazy and uncaring to
get off their butts to find out where their children are and what
they are doing). Stokvels, social clubs, gyms, sports associations,
Toastmasters etc. These are all community life outside the purely
religious.

--
Moira de Swardt posting from Johannesburg, South Africa
Remove the dot in my address to find me at home.

Loading...